HACS refused to close the Rotterdam+ case, despite the complete absence of corpus delicti,

Defense lawyer Artem Trekke said that he does not see any problems in this decision, given the complete absence of elements and events of the crime in the actions of the defendants, the absence of losses and the expiration of the deadlines for the pre-trial investigation. This was reported by the Oboz publication with reference to the lawyer’s comment.

He recalled that it was HACS, including its appeal chamber and two different SAPO prosecutors who had already made decisions that upheld the prosecutor’s decision to close this case. This, in his opinion, means that even the anti-corruption authorities themselves and the anti-corruption court do not believe in the prospects of this case.

This case was already completely won by the defense in the first and appellate instances of the Supreme Court of Justice and began again under the same circumstances with the use of non-procedural decisions and violation…